d00dj00sux0r

* = Koran or hadith.

+ = wherein we go to the video tape

1- DENY:
When the mark asks you about the violence which seems inherent in Islam, tell them that “Islam” means “peace”. If they point out to you that “salam” is in fact the word for peace, and that “Islam” means “submission”, respond by insisting that they have the same “s_l_m” root-word.

If the mark happens to be a smart-ass, they may suggest that “catamite” and “cataphract” have the same root-word, too. This would be a good time to continue on to #2.

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2- MISDIRECT:
Quote an incomplete verse or an abrogated one from Muhammad’s “Mecca period”. This is a real favorite,

Koran 5:32:

“Whoever kills a person [unjustly]…it is as though he has killed all mankind. And whoever saves a life, it is as though he had saved all mankind.”

But never quote the actual, full version* or what follows after it*.

…nor should you mention the accepted and authoritative interpretation of Said bin Jubayr:

“He who allows himself to shed the blood of a Muslim, is like he who allows shedding the blood of all people. He who forbids shedding the blood of one Muslim, is like he who forbids shedding the blood of all people.”

Avoid quoting anything from after Muhammad left Mecca, if you can. We don’t want outsiders scrutinizing the “Medina period” of the the Prophet’s life. We don’t even want too many Muslims doing it.

Remember, the mark’s ignorance is your strength.

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

3- LIE:
If the outsider turns to questions of the treatment of women, tell them that going behind-the-curtain is actually liberating and that Islam has only the highest respect for females.

If you completely ignore the actual, real-world treatment of women+ underneath Shari’a, don’t worry. Odds are your mark will too… so long as you deny that these things are “real” Islam.

Never mention Muhammad’s condoning the forced insemination of female captives at Banu Al-Mustaliq* as being in the hands of Allah, and thus that his holy warriors should not practice coitus interuptus when committing rape upon their Malak-ul-Yameen, or “right-hand possessions“.

Avoid mentioning the rights women in the Middle-East enjoyed before they came under Islamic rule (the Jaheliyah, or “Age of Ignorance”). The Prophet in his wisdom made this easier for us by having all pre-Islamic Arabic writings destroyed, but nonetheless guide outsiders away from the contextual clues such as Khadijah, Muhammad’s first wife, having been both a wealthy merchant and his employer.

You probably also shouldn’t mention how the Prophet revealed that it is okay to beat your wives*, or that Hell is full of women*, either. Certainly you shouldn’t explain how the same term for disobedient behavior specifically by domesticated animals is applied to women+ by the Prophet himself.

Remember, the mark’s ignorance is your strength.

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

4- ACCUSE:
If the unbeliever proves resistant to your hustle, go on the attack… by playing the victim!

Bring up the Crusades as evidence of the brutality of Christians and the Western world, but never mention that neither Arabs nor Islam are indigenous to the Holy Land, or how four hundred years of violence and coercion were necessary to bring most of the peoples outside Arabia proper to the word of Allah previous to Byzantine’s cry for European intervention at the end of the 11th century.

Look around the room, if you see any of the following items, hide them as quickly and surreptitiously as possible:

Maps of pre-Islamic Arabia

Maps of Europe from between the turn of the 8th century until the end of the 19th century.

Maps of India from the 11th century through the 17th century.

In fact, maps and reference materials in general should be hidden on general principle, just in case.

Certainly one should also avoid mentioning that the West and Christians generally long ago condemned the various un-Christian acts throughout its history.

Remember, the mark’s ignorance is your strength.

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

5- MISDIRECT:
If the mark is persistent in his (or her) questioning, blame the Jews via Israel for Islamic terrorism. As with #4, you will have to obscure a great deal of history, particularly regarding the pogroms against Jews in Islamic lands (especially from the 1940’s to early 1960’s), the Jizya*, et cetera, and make sure various maps of not only the ancient but also the modern world are not readily displayed anywhere nearby. Avoid any discussion of Mein Kampf’s unusual popularity in the Arab world.

You would be shrewd to ensure that you do not have any Jordanian and “Palestinian” flags hanging near each other, as well.

Always emphasize how Hamas and associates are completely innocent freedom fighters and are being oppressed+ without any provocation or wrongdoing on their part+.

Make no mention of the actual nations of origin of either Yasser Arafat (Egypt) or any other such noteworthy “Palestinian”. Or any “Palestinian”, for that matter.

Make no mention of Israel being a desolate and largely uninhabited wasteland of swamps and deserts previous to the return of the diaspora and their efforts to make it habitable, which involved the hiring of vast numbers of Arab immigrants.

Make no mention of the mass voluntary exodus of said Arabs immediately preceding the second invasion of Israel by multiple genocidal military forces.

Do emphasize how racist and intolerant the Israelis are; make sure to pretend the Beta Israel do not exist, likewise the Druze, and especially the IDF’s all-Muslim Bedouin/Cherkes reconnaissance units.

Around unbelievers it’s “We hate the Jews because of Israel,” not, “We hate Israel because Jews are our dogs.” (Or at least, not in English+.)

Remember, the mark’s ignorance is your strength.

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

6- DENY:
If the mark is particularly wily, they may at this point ask you if you are practicing al-Taqiyya on them, or as Westerners often call it, “hustling” or “bullshitting”.

If the outsider uses either of the latter terms, skip to #7.

If the outsider refers to al-Taqiyya or one of its several related Islamic principles directly, quickly follow one or all of the following lines:

A- Al-Taqiyya does not exist.

B- If they know better than that, and you are Sunni, claim that only Shi’a practice al-Taqiyya. Remember, the best lies contain a little truth!

C- If you are Shi’a or they nail you on B, claim that al-Taqiyya was only invented by Muslims in Europe (don’t mention how they got there) during the Spanish Inquisition as a defensive measure. While you are saying this, take the opportunity to hide your Koran* and hadith too*.

If all else fails, then proceed to #7

7- ACCUSE:
Cry out, “Racist!“, “Paranoid!“, “Islamiphobe!“. It doesn’t matter that the worship of the word of Muhammad is an ideology and not a “race”, this will still work. It does not even matter that millions have died and will die for the furtherance of the Dar al-Islam’s conquest of the Dar al-Harb.

The kafirs are funny like that.

Remember, the mark’s desire for acceptance and a sense of fashionable sophistication is your greatest strength.

Did I ever mention that I hate cops? What a bunch of lazy two faced lying sacks of shit. In my whole life there’s only been one person I’ve ever known personally that either wanted to be a cop or became a cop that wasn’t a complete douchebag who should have never been placed in a position of authority.

I just read a nice little story on CNN today that illustrates what kind of assholes cops are. In 2004 a three year old girl named Riley Fox disappeared from her home one night as her brother and father were sleeping nearby. She was later found dead in a nearby creek. She was bound with duct tape and had been raped. It’s thought that she had been tossed into the creek to drown from a nearby bridge.

Now, in cases such as these, the father often is the culprit and he’s grilled relentlessly until he confesses. In this case however, five months passed before the police decided it was time to put her father through a grueling 14 hour interrogation session during which they obtained his false confession.

Kevin Fox spent eight months in jail before DNA evidence finally exonerated him and nullified his false confession. You would think that at this point the police would actually get to work on the case… I mean shit bubba! The daddy didn’t do it, now we actually gotta go find the killer. Instead, they sat idle for another FOUR YEARS and did nothing.

The case is finally being investigated again and the FBI is involved. Hopefully some actual police work will be done and justice will be delivered.

In another startling display of not giving a fuck, AIG was prepared to award it’s executives a $165 million first wave of bonuses. With a total payout schedule of $450 million President Obama has promised the American people to use all legal means available to block these bonuses.

American lawmakers expressed outrage and empathized with the taxpaying public, saying things such as “I understand why the American people are angry” and “Maybe it’s time to fire some people”.

My question is how much longer will these corporations blatantly rob from America before a company like AIG winds up getting the Oklahoma City treatment?

“Pork chops. Greedy little pork chops. Greed, incompetence… I want cunning, merciless, crazed enemies… Not ones that can be vanquished by kicking their flap jack asses down a flight of stairs.”
- Andrew T. Cutler

Domestically, we shall see shackles placed upon the First Amendment, aimed particularly towards talk radio, but possibly also bloggers, seeking to silence the voices of political conservatism and Classical Liberalism. This will be called “Fairness”.

We shall see thorough subversion of the Second Amendment, the failure of each assault upon this Constitutional right to reduce violent crime used as justification for further assault. This will be called “Progress”.

We shall see widespread increases in taxation, crippling our industries and increasing unemployment, but little will be said of them by major media outlets. What we shall instead hear of, loud and clear, will be the various tax-credit schemes put into place, and how these will benefit us. The true result of this will never be spoken of: That our money is no longer our money, it is the State’s, which will grant us the privilege of borrowing an amount after we have answered to them. Taxed according to our ability to produce, credited according to our ability to grovel, this will be called “Justice”.

The blame for all ills will be shamelessly, self-righteously redirected upon the Bush administration and political conservatives in general, as was the case with the late economic crisis, which was an innevitable product of the Marxist policies (and the corruption they gave rise to) born of the Carter administration.

In foreign affairs, the best interests of our citizenry shall take a back seat to the mandates of the unelected bureaucrats of the United Nations.

The Far East will be at the mercy of China and their frothing puppet, North Korea. This may fair poorly for our ally, Taiwan.

In the Middle East, Afghanistan will likely, short of someone such as Gen. Patraeus being given a free hand over operations, be transformed from a difficult yet tenable battleground into the stagnant quagmire the mainstream media has for so long attempted to portray it as.

Israel will no longer be able to afford the risk of placing any trust in their sole military ally to assist them with either pen or sword, as it is now administrated by a man who spent twenty years quietly attending the anti-Semitic tirades of a mad preacher, a man who has shown nothing but sympathy for some of their most pernicious enemies. They will strike to destroy Iran’s nuclear ambitions, and if any neighbor is seen mobilizing for invasion, they may answer with the first atomic weapons fired in anger since World War II. If they are to survive, if they do not wish to see their women and children at the mercy of those who have none, they will have little other choice.

Iraq, now all but won, may see a sudden and dramatic increase in cassualties with the result of our new Commander in Chief surrendering all and pulling our forces out as quickly as possible. Alternatively, we may see a period of unexpected peace, lulling our aforementioned commander into withdrawing our fighting men en masse. This will be followed by absolute bedlam, as the Iranian-backed jihadis commit to a renewed and vigorous effort to make the people of Iraq pay for their audacity and apostasy in believing they could live by any law other than a tyrant’s will or an Imam’s decrees.

If Iraq does fall, Iran, possibly even Russia, will invade under the auspice of establishing peace, placing puppets into the seats of power and slaughtering all who oppose them. No serious move will be made on our part to prevent this, and our new-found allies will be left to the wolves.

The long held dream of Middle-East oil state autocrats and theocrats, that of shutting off all oil supplies to the West, shall become attainable. America, though we possess enough crude to last for the next two centuries will, by having left these resources untapped due to pressure from environmentalist lobbies and the obstinacy of the political left, be forced to scramble for self-sufficiency as our economy approaches the brink of total collapse.

Europe, completely dependent upon foreign oil and stripped of our protection, will have but two choices: kowtow to Russia, or beggar themselves to Iran. Numerous European states may in desperation turn to seizing their neighbor’s supplies and resources, if only to buy themselves a little time. Warfare unlike any seen since World War II will tear the European Union to pieces, and leave even the victors in dire straights.

There will be no Marshall Plan this time, and the wolves will be waiting with promises of Peace, and Order.

…as well as our allies the Iraqis, Afghanis, Georgians, and others:

We are all about to embark on what I believe will be an extremely painful historic lesson.

So pay attention.

Sincerely,

Eric N. Squires